Donald Rumsfeld famously remarked on the differences between "known unknowns" and "unknown unknowns, or things we do not know we don't know". I've just learned that I did not know that sociologists have studied community gardens as spaces for collective action. I'm relieved to know that my experience in promoting "collective gardening" is not simple and the difficulties are not at all unusual. One paper recognizes three types of garden management depending on the relative importance of individual versus shared plots and whether or not there is a need to be a "member" of the garden to participate.
So my purpose today is simply to acknowledge areas of disagreement and continue a discussion of how the L4 Collective can move forward without undermining the support for community gardening as it has been widely practiced in the United States. According to the definitions in that paper, the West Street Community Garden is classified as a "closed garden group" managed by a "nested enterprise" (the Essex Junction Recreation and Parks Department). Plotholders grow for themselves and largely by themselves with some (low!) level of collaboration to maintain paths and facilities. This is basically the most restrictive model and the least welcoming to any collective gardening. Thankfully, to my mind, this model is ceding ground over time to collective models or at least to share space with them.
I have found that the biggest objection to collective gardening is directly related to the degree of theft and damage that occurs at West Street. Even kind and generous gardeners object to "inviting the public" into the community garden whether that be for gardening, gardening education or social functions. Plotholders grow food, the public steals it, as it were. A second objection involves the problem of membership and who is entitled to what.
I wish it were otherwise, but I am naive.
I have been fortunate to visit several community gardens and be made aware of more open and collaborative approaches. Gardeners at West Street are generous with their friends and make donations to food pantries often, but there is little acknowledgement that a "collective enterprise" can operate for the benefit of many groups and not just the plotholders. The state land at West Street is an enormous asset for all residents. I believe collective action can help many more residents in many important ways, but it is not my intent today to think much beyond the next growing season.
Instead, I'd like to focus on two aspects of the garden that commanded my attention after the torrential rains in the summer of 2023. The flooding of local farms and of several large community gardens in Burlington and elsewhere made clear that the well drained, sandy soil (Adams soil type) at West Street has the advantage of drying out quickly, never approaching saturation. The first aspect is that there is unused space, both in and around the garden boundary, to produce healthful food for the benefit of our community. The L4 Collective, in partnership with others, grew food for Aunt Dot's Place because there were abandoned plots and because we understood that fresh local vegetables were to be in short supply. The second aspect is that West Street could become a teaching garden, formal or informal, without fear of the flooding that closed other educational gardens in 2011 and again in 2023. We are as high and dry as one can get in a Vermont community garden.
The idea we are pursuing for now is to commit to grow on plots that are unused or donated to the L4 Collective for the purpose of supplying local food shelves. We planted a small orchard last Spring and plan to use an adjacent plot this year for annual vegetables. This takes nothing away from any plotholder and defines a "garden within a garden" with clear boundaries and relatively clear responsibilities. It provides ample opportunity for collective action while inconveniencing no one. It does, however, involve inviting the public to participate. I should like to draw a distinction between "the public" and "people who want to participate in collective gardening." I have complete faith that nobody who has worked with L4 Collective has ever stolen or vandalized any crops. And I will assert that increased participation will decrease theft. I wish I could prove it.
Now, as we are all about gardening, it seems only appropriate when we gather together as gardeners that we discuss the latest science(!) of soil health and its connection to environmental and human health. We have the knowledge and skills in our community to teach about the soil health principals informed by science and nature. The USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) has researched and published important work that applies to our gardens as much if not more than to farms. In my opinion, NRCS is a governmental organization that executes its charter faithfully and professionally. Their findings and recommendations deserve to be discussed. We've paid for them already. As before, this activity necessarily involves inviting people to the garden, people I do not believe will steal food.
So I invite you to comment and I invite you to join us. Let's se if we can create something valuable while respecting the soil and respecting one another. Acknowledging our humility, let us work on “unperfected common in the making”.